News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by dijit on Monday July 29, 2019 @07:20AM (#20553343)
I would have said "move to git.kernel.org" but that's also hosted by a US based provider:

    organisation:   ORG-PHI3-RIPE
    org-name:       Packet Host Inc
    org-type:       OTHER
    address:        30 Vesey Street, Suite 900, New York, NY 10007 US
And, obviously GNOME git servers are US based, since they're owned by RedHat/IBM.
Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by maze-le on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:02AM (#20553597)
Use a self hosted gogs installation (https://gogs.io/) under your own domain and root server outside US jurisdiction.
Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by swiley on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:19AM (#20553744)
Or just use ssh. That’s what I’ve always done with my friends when we didn’t want to use GitHub.

There’s no need to over complicate things.

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by nerdponx on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:22AM (#20553769)
GitLab is self-hostable as well, although I imagine Gogs is easier.
Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by dijit on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:47AM (#20553993)
Gitlab is actually super easy if you keep to the omnibus installation methods or docker image.

The only problem regarding gitlab is resource consumption.

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by cuillevel3 on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:56AM (#20554605)
If your company operates in the US and uses a provider, who does not implement sanctions, does it have to enforce them on its own?

I mean, something like selling a product, maybe based on open source tech in the US and cooperating with devs in sanctioned countries via a workaround provider..