GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria and Crimea

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Monday July 29, 2019 @07:17AM (#20553316)

We made it point now to avoid all US-based services. While we're not affected by the sanctions yet, it seems like it is a possibility in the future. There's really not a lot of reasons to use Gitlab or Github or Slack or a number of other services. They're not exceptional in any way and can be replaced by other open-source or commercial projects.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by diminoten on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:56AM (#20554090)

Convenience and speed aren't reasons?

You're handicapping yourself against your competitors, and no one who does that lasts very long.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:38AM (#20554446)

Don't see it that way. If I set up a process once, using software that's been tested and been around for a while, it's extremely convenient. And free. And there's no risk of deplatforming.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by diminoten on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:48PM (#20558627)

You're completely ignoring feature parity, among many, many other things in your oversimplification...

Ask any founder here: people don't generally randomly throw money without getting value; ergo these multibillion dollar services you're pretending are entirely replaceable with free tools offer some additional value .

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @12:10AM (#20562076)

I'm a founder. I'm extremely careful not throwing money. And I'm especially am aware of the changing environment. The internet is no longer free. You depend on a third party, you lose. The only true way is to gradually build your own infrastructure as you grow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by diminoten on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @11:15AM (#20565598)

That's fine, but pretending like this is an objectively superior solution and the value prop of these companies doesn't exist is flat wrong.

What if someone applied your own logic to buying your product (why pay when I can get the exact same thing from free tools)? It'd be annoying and generally wrong, wouldn't it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @01:01AM (#20571806)

I'm happy to pay. To me, however, the value lies in predictability, sustainability and avoiding the risk of deplatforming. Tech companies come and go and are subject to political issues (as proven by Github). Thus, sometimes, it's wiser to pay engineers to set things up than buy a product/service.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by diminoten on Wednesday July 31, 2019 @03:38PM (#20577563)

You're shifting the conversation though, this wasn't about what your priorities are it was about whether or not the products provide value. You claimed they don't, you are now saying they do provide value?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Thursday August 01, 2019 @05:27PM (#20588534)

I never said those products don't provide value, I only said they're not exceptional in providing that value and that value can be obtained by carefully considering alternative solutions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by diminoten on Thursday August 01, 2019 @07:33PM (#20589374)

> There's really not a lot of reasons to use Gitlab or Github or Slack or a number of other services.

That is completely different from what you are saying now...

Also, "that value can be found elsewhere" is a devious little shift in the meaning of the word "value" in "value prop". Nice try but no, that isn't the same thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by batat on Monday July 29, 2019 @10:36AM (#20555029)

Even further. Wondered why there are no single Stallman reference here and in the previous discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20531039

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by Tinfoilhat666 on Monday July 29, 2019 @10:51AM (#20555171)

How do you get payments from your customers? Most payments are processed by US companies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by snitko on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:35PM (#20557141)

Bitcoin.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by asdfman123 on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:50AM (#20555846)

Keep in mind the sanctions affect all companies that do business in the US.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by nathanaldensr on Monday July 29, 2019 @07:18AM (#20553323)

Yep, and this is a sign of the ecosystem working well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub confirms it has blocked developers in Iran, Syria ... by ardani on Monday July 29, 2019 @07:29AM (#20553394)

In the same line, if there's any forum I take with a spoonful of salt it's Hacker News.

[ Parent | on HN ]