Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by Svip on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:53AM
(#20552375)
Are you saying livestock does not live on a diet less varied than humans? As I understand it, they aren't as picky about food as humans are.
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by adrianN on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:57AM
(#20552403)
Livestock mostly lives on soy and corn, things that humans can eat too (or, growing on lands that could produce human food). Some meat can be had in a sustainable way, animals are part of a sustainable agriculture as they can eat food waste or graze on low productivity (or recovering) lands, while naturally adding fertilizer to the soil. The current level of industrial meat production is quite far from that.
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by imtringued on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:56AM
(#20554614)
The idea that animals only eat food that humans can't consume is very strange. The animals get fed whatever is cheapest on the market, even if that involves burning the rainforest and depleting its soil permanently or feeding them skittles.
Re:The human body is already close to thermal limits in many...
by esotericn on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:54AM
(#20552385)
"Picky" is a strange way to put it.
Our baseline should be what is required for a healthy body and brain. We can go up from there.
Going down from the current level is farcical. We're in a crisis.
I like me an avocado as much as the next person, but if they need a 500% tax (invented, I don't actually know) to incorporate externalities, they need it. End of.
Like, seriously. It doesn't matter what we "want" at this point. Carbon needs pricing or we are totally fucked.
The only way that meat could win on either metric is if livestock are able to subsist on a diet far less varied than humans; essentially if they are better able to convert lower quality feedstock into higher quality meat.