News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by rootlocus on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:45AM (#20552328)
The original qmail was widely known for being very secure and fast. This implementation on the other hand, is apparently marketed using warez slang?

> Netqmail 1.06 is produced by this motley krewe

Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by schmonz on Monday July 29, 2019 @09:40AM (#20554469)
"This implementation" is notqmail, which none of the netqmail people are involved in.

netqmail 1.06, which none of us notqmail people were involved in, was produced by a handful of people I have often referred to as "list elders". They were very informed, very conservative, and very careful.

Nothing wrong with heuristics. It's a busy world out there. I appreciate that you're aware you're using one here, and I thought you might like to know it's led you astray. As a notqmail developer, I hope we live up to the standards set by the netqmail folks.

Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by amfsn on Monday July 29, 2019 @05:58AM (#20552980)
Does using warez slang automatically make software less secure and slower?
Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by Fnoord on Monday July 29, 2019 @06:51AM (#20553197)
It reduces confidence because warez is associated with running cracked software of which you don't know exactly what was modified/added/etc.
Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by jameskegel on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:36AM (#20553894)
My how far we’ve come in such a short few years.
Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by Fnoord on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:42AM (#20553956)
Eh, not sure what you mean, but yeah some DRM is obnoxious and almost spyware. Warden, World of Warcraft's DRM, is for example profiling your system hard.
Re:Notqmail: Collaborative open-source successor to qmail by rootlocus on Monday July 29, 2019 @08:38AM (#20553912)
It speaks to the priorities, attitude and / or the work ethics of the developers involved. I wouldn't trust people who care about using teenager slang and looking cool to write secure and efficient services that I could use in production with customer data. I may be wrong, but my confidence is still low.