Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by soberhoff on Sunday July 28, 2019 @12:02PM
(#20548186)
What are we even arguing over? Is it just over the exact percentage of signaling in education's payoff?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by Hermitian909 on Sunday July 28, 2019 @01:26PM
(#20548705)
I thought we were arguing over two things:
How much value is created through publicly funded education beyond basic literacy and numeracy, which Caplan cedes.
Whether Caplan's proposed changes to the education system are good ones.
Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR
by soberhoff on Monday July 29, 2019 @06:01AM
(#20552991)
Regarding the first point, Caplan personally estimates that about 80% of education is signalling and that 30% is the lowest figure one can plausibly maintain.
As for the second point, I wouldn't bet my life on it. But I think the case is strong enough that experimental measures in that direction are warranted.