News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR by justforyou on Sunday July 28, 2019 @10:46AM (#20547817)
>> educational attainment, elite professional success, number of patents, publications etc.

None of these are meaningful measures of intelligence.

Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR by haihaibye on Tuesday July 30, 2019 @09:19AM (#20564530)
They correlate and as I said are 'easily measured.. proxies for intelligence'

You can't just sequence people who have accomplished great things and are widely recognised as geniuses as there aren't enough of then and they're busy.

We need huge sample sizes. Ideally, you'd sequence a million people and have them sit rigorous tests, interviews etc. But it's way cheaper and faster to have them tick boxes on forms.

Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR by justforyou on Thursday August 01, 2019 @10:48AM (#20584163)
>> They correlate and as I said are 'easily measured.. proxies for intelligence'

You're going to have to provide meaningful evidence to back up the assertion that numbers of patents (as well as the other criteria listed) actually correlate to higher intelligence.

Re:Biology is the New Tech: Letter from a conference on CRISPR by sgt101 on Sunday July 28, 2019 @03:11PM (#20549293)
As anyone who has worked at a university or a research lab has said always!