Re:Adblocking: How about Nah?
by la_barba on Saturday July 27, 2019 @06:04PM
(#20544511)
By "we" do you mean only people who agree with you? Or do you accept that in a democratic society there can be ads? Personally, I don't block ads on principle. I simply don't visit websites that feature blaring over the top ads or otherwise feature annoyances. When you block ads you are explicitly signalling that you are receiving something of value by visiting the website. I prefer to not send that signal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah?
by intopieces on Saturday July 27, 2019 @06:32PM
(#20544666)
>When you block ads you are explicitly signalling that you are receiving something of value by visiting the website.
This is not the case. I have visited thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of websites in which the content was not valuable to me, and I blocked those ads, too.
When I block ads, I send the signal that my attention is not for sale, and moreover, the content creators' business model is not my concern. Eventually, if they get the enough of these signals, they'll find a new way to make money.
You think you're doing that, but in reality the site thinks they're hot shit, and people just are annoyed with the ads.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah?
by cameronbrown on Saturday July 27, 2019 @07:22PM
(#20544853)
Except you're also blocking their analytics scripts, so you don't send any signal at all.
You don't need scripts to know who visited your website. Scripts can potentially tell you how many are blocking your ads though. But its always a cat and mouse game. I prefer to simply avoid sites that show shitty ads.
They should learn to do the job correctly and look at the server logs too.
Re:Adblocking: How about Nah?
by cameronbrown on Sunday July 28, 2019 @06:05AM
(#20546727)
I'm not saying you're wrong.