Re:Bedridden for 11 years, he discovered a surgery for his a...
by ricardobeat on Saturday July 27, 2019 @08:56AM
(#20541827)
I understand the urge to summarize, but maybe interested HN users can be expected to read the article before coming to the comments? This seriously degrades the quality of discussion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bedridden for 11 years, he discovered a surgery for his a...
by alexandercrohde on Saturday July 27, 2019 @09:14AM
(#20541891)
It's fine to bemoan people commenting who haven't read the article, but reading the comments first to gauge if the article is clickbait/whatever is a perfectly valid use-case.
I also cherish summaries like these - if I read the whole article I won't remember more than 2 sentences of it tomorrow. That distillation process is inevitable and good. It's a service to do it well for those who are time/memory-limited.
Re:Bedridden for 11 years, he discovered a surgery for his a...
by unityByFreedom on Sunday July 28, 2019 @08:20AM
(#20547149)
Thanks! At the time I wrote this, the majority of comments were focused on criticizing the headline [1], and there was little discussion of the article itself.
Now I see there are many comments about the content of the article. I don't know if the summary caused more people to read it or not. I wanted to encourage more readership and on-topic discussion.
Re:Bedridden for 11 years, he discovered a surgery for his a...
by amundsentb on Saturday July 27, 2019 @09:04AM
(#20541854)
I am often more interested in the comments here than the content of the article so I am happy with the summary.
I can often understand what the article is about and go to the comment section for pros and cons
Re:Bedridden for 11 years, he discovered a surgery for his a...
by ricardobeat on Saturday July 27, 2019 @10:13AM
(#20542117)
For reading, maybe, but it's a lot harder to contribute something meaningful if you don't know the context to start with.