Counterpoint: Was generally seen as the best word processor unless you had to use it with an RTL language.
In other words, it was perfect for (WORLD.population - 500mm)
What's bloat for you may be an essential need for your fellow worder.
#funfacts:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-boosts-languages-pro...
Office has gotten worse for me since 97, they added more and more crap that I didn't need and then put it front and center with a "look at the crap we added you don't need" design.
These days I write in markdown and it it has to be pretty format it in libre office (mdpdf works fine for 99% of my uses though).
Re:Users hate change
by Doctor_Fegg on Friday July 26, 2019 @02:02PM
(#20536863)
MacWrite Pro was also released in 1992 and its UI was streets ahead of Word 5.1’s. Unfortunately its performance was laggy and, even by then, Word was so much the incumbent that it was hard to compete. But I loved MWP.
Also, as others often said, 5.0 seemed like a broken release, and the ".1" was a much bigger upgrade than is normally implied by a non-major-version number. So it is version 5.1, and not version 5.0, that is remembered fondly.