News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by ckemere on Thursday July 25, 2019 @05:40PM (#20530053)
I'd say that in this respect most researchers operate very similarly to startups that are often featured on HN. Seems a bit unfair to say the research should be closed down without saying the same thing, e.g., about Uber/Lyft, Doordash, or even Amazon (insofar as they are all promising to revolutionize something and make money sustainably)?

That is not to say that the HBP wasn't widely perceived as ridiculous from the outset by people with relevant technical knowledge. I think the bottom line is that we should respect scientists that are able to cast an audacious vision, raise crazy amounts of money, and then actually deliver, e.g., Christoph Koch/Allen Institute.

Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by roywiggins on Thursday July 25, 2019 @07:25PM (#20530870)
Publicly funded research must be held to a higher standard. Investors can throw their own money at whatever, but when you're throwing someone else's money, there's a duty to actually communicate to the public what you're spending it on.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by nicoburns on Thursday July 25, 2019 @08:27PM (#20531224)
Investors being wasteful with money is a good argument for them not having it in the first place (and having a more progressive taxation system dustribute that money). There is still a cost to society of investors throwing away "private" money.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by roywiggins on Friday July 26, 2019 @11:59AM (#20535761)
My current favorite evidence for this cost is Gates' horrendous attempt at reshaping education

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2018/06/...