News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by dekhn on Thursday July 25, 2019 @04:49PM (#20529536)
it's pretty standard in granting to overpromise like this and if you don't do it you will be at a disadvantage relative to your peers.
Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by msds on Thursday July 25, 2019 @10:20PM (#20531827)
I recently saw (1) and this brought it to mind - as someone who has written a few funded $250-500k grants, it's a very familiar feeling, and I assume it only gets worse when you get to RO1 and "infinite euromoney" levels.

1) https://www.reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/cgy6uz/comment/e...

Re:Brain Simulation Promised a Decade Ago Hasn't Succeeded by dekhn on Friday July 26, 2019 @10:00AM (#20534844)
On my first RO1, it was returned unscored (basically not even reviewed). It was a clever idea that was ahead of its time. the next year I noticed that the same section had several proposals which were effectively copies of mine written by more experienced PIs and at least one of them was funded even though they had no expertise in the area.

I left academia shortly after that (no interest in that competition) for FAANG and got more and better research done in my 20% time than I ever did in academia. I've spoken to many program managers who would love to fdund clever new ideas from creative young PIs, but are under strain to produce a reliable stream of papers from more experienced PIs who train postdocs.