Re:Use plaintext email
by throw0101a on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @05:37PM
(#20520047)
Replying to myself with an example of brain damage HTML e-mail, the contents of a message body:
> <html><head>
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
> <meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="0; URL=https://c.na39.content.force.com/servlet/servlet.EmailAttach... [...] ">
> </head><body>
> <div>Attachment not opening? Click this link: <a href="https://c.na39.content.force.com/servlet/servlet.EmailAttach... [...] ">ColorAnalysisWithOMA300.pdf</a>
> </div></html>
From a post made today:
But given the carnage that HTML e-mail being the normal has caused in phishing and other privacy invading manners, I question whether the benefits of those use cases and preferences out-weight the detriments of the practice. Just ask John Podesta:
> SecureWorks concluded Fancy Bear had sent Podesta an email on March 19, 2016, that had the appearance of a Google security alert, but actually contained a misleading link—a strategy known as spear-phishing. (This tactic has also been used by hackers to break into the accounts of other notable persons, such as Colin Powell). The link[10]—which used the URL shortening service Bitly—brought Podesta to a fake log-in page where he entered his Gmail credentials.[1][9][11][12] The email was initially sent to the IT department as it was suspected of being a fake but was described as "legitimate" in an e-mail sent by a department employee, who later said he meant to write "illegitimate".[13][14][15]
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podesta_emails
Or countless others who have been phished.