Re:Use plaintext email
by wongarsu on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @08:31AM
(#20514505)
All of the reasons given against HTML emails hold at least equally well against PDF: it's a vector for phishing and tracking, ripe with client vulnerabilities, less accessible and not displayable on a terminal. For me as a reader having to read both an E-Mail and the attached PDF is also annoying, and many people will simply skip reading the PDF.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Use plaintext email
by throw0101a on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @08:53AM
(#20514697)
> For me as a reader having to read both an E-Mail and the attached PDF is also annoying, and many people will simply skip reading the PDF.
See also embedding (e.g.) a JPEG in a Word document and then attaching that Word document to an e-mail.
I've seen so many Word or PPT documents with a single hyperlink in them, uploaded to SharePoint with filenames like "process_manual_2013_v3.2.doc"...
Ugh.
Re:Use plaintext email
by throw0101a on Wednesday July 24, 2019 @10:17PM
(#20522051)
Just ran across this: an HTML e-mail that is only a link (i.e., HTML <head> refresh):
* https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/ch83sz/why_the_he...