News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to assess the quality of garments (2014) by iamdead on Tuesday July 23, 2019 @05:51AM (#20505547)
The story is a simplification, and that's its flaw, like most stories.

My experience is that while lifetime and cost are often correlated, they aren't always, the ratio is often a curve, and the curve is different for every product. My $10 Casio watch has outlasted some nicer watches costing more than $100. But I once made the mistake of buying a $40 pair of shoes, and they were unwearable within a few months.

Another example is that high-end suits with high thread count are supposedly less durable than less expensive suits, because the finer, more comfortable fabric is also thinner and wears more quickly.

Re:How to assess the quality of garments (2014) by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday July 23, 2019 @08:39AM (#20506229)
Then on top of that there's market inefficacy. You can readily buy high quality shoes that are normally $200+ for under $100 if you don't mind them being boots and only available in black, coyote tan and sage green.
Re:How to assess the quality of garments (2014) by rdtwo on Tuesday July 23, 2019 @09:27AM (#20506531)
You can get iron rangers for around 180 every couple months. That’s probably the best deal around
Re:How to assess the quality of garments (2014) by thrav on Tuesday July 23, 2019 @10:56AM (#20507220)
My closet is filled with Iron Rangers, 1000 miles, AEs, and handmade Mocs. All purchased at steep discounts or second hand stores. All look better than the day I bought them years later.

My oldest pair of shoes are going on 11 years, and look even better than the rest after one re-sole.