Re:Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
by snek on Sunday July 21, 2019 @02:57PM
(#20493016)
Did you read the article?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I read the article.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but did they do this test on a 128 kilobit cellular Internet connection?
Re:Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
by csande17 on Sunday July 21, 2019 @03:14PM
(#20493108)
I made the video in the article using Chrome's "low-end mobile" throttling preset, which simulates a ~300 kbit connection IIRC. But I saw very similar behavior on my actual phone with an actual 128 kilobit connection in Canada.
Thanks for the clarification. Do the conclusions hold up when testing with a broadband network connection?
Re:Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
by csande17 on Sunday July 21, 2019 @03:21PM
(#20493135)
As I mention in the article, I'm not really able to tell the difference between old MDN and new MDN on the fast network connection I usually use. They both load pretty much instantly for me.
Re:Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
by saagarjha on Sunday July 21, 2019 @03:24PM
(#20493155)
I sometimes wonder if website authors actually test their pages on slow connections before declaring that they’ve improved the experience for them…
Re:Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
by spankalee on Sunday July 21, 2019 @03:55PM
(#20493308)
Do all MDN users have low-latency, high-bandwidth connections?
I’m a bit lost. How would using a broadband connection affect the relative speed between the two versions ?
For one, latency has a proportionally higher impact on "time to render" at lower connection speeds.