News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Woman with Immortal Cells by xd on Wednesday December 29, 2010 @09:33AM (#2048753)
I would have thought lawyers would be all over getting this family' cut, even without being paid up front.

In the UK we are flooded with no-win no-fee lawyers.

How come this hasn't happened?

Re:Woman with Immortal Cells by araneae on Wednesday December 29, 2010 @10:27AM (#2048894)
The exact reason for this is actually very well detailed in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, which was published this year.

For one, one man did, but he was a con artist that made the family hesitant to ever talk to anyone again. When Rebecca Skoot went to interview the family for the book, they accused her of being his crony. It took her 10 years to write this book, partly because it took that long for them to open up to her.

The other half of the reason is that lawyers have, and they've gotten nowhere. There's actually a rather long legal precedent in the U.S. that the tissue taken from a person in the course of a medical treatment doesn't belong to them. It is considered medical waste, and part of the argument is that restricting its usage would hurt medical progress. This is why it is perfectly legal for hospitals to sell the foreskin of circumcised infants to pharmaceutical companies, for instance.