News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oregon passed sweeping housing crisis laws by BeetleB on Saturday July 20, 2019 @12:31PM (#20486710)
>If you’re managing 1,000 units renting them all is a sign you have left money on the table.

That is the very definition of an outlier. Most landlords (easily over 90%) don't even have a 100 units. In fact, most landlords have a target number of units they need to "retire", and that number is usually less than 100.

Re:Oregon passed sweeping housing crisis laws by Retric on Saturday July 20, 2019 @12:40PM (#20486789)
From the market’s perspective it’s the ratio of units managed by each type that matters.

Hypothetically, if 1 company managed 1,000 units and 1,000 people managed 1 unit then that outlier owns 50% of the market while representing 0.1% of the land lords.

Re:Oregon passed sweeping housing crisis laws by BeetleB on Saturday July 20, 2019 @02:34PM (#20487492)
It would be interesting to see this breakdown in numbers. I would suspect there's some kind of power law at work, although probably not as extreme as the example you gave.

Also, keep in mind that on the flip side, landlords likely view tenants the same way - looking at aggregates and not individuals: "Yes, lots of people can't afford the rent, but as long as I can get enough to make a profit, who cares about the rest?"

Re:Oregon passed sweeping housing crisis laws by vl on Saturday July 20, 2019 @05:13PM (#20488412)
Managing 1000 units is way beyond full-time job, for this you need staff, which is additional expense.