News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Wired's Response to Glenn Greenwald (re:Lamo-Manning Chat Logs). Parent comment

Re:Wired's Response to Glenn Greenwald (re:Lamo-Manning Chat... by tptacek on Wednesday December 29, 2010 @12:41AM (#2048051)
There's nothing they can reasonably do to not be "fishy" to WL supporters. Releasing the chat transcripts no more gets Wired out of the Lamo/Poulsen quandary than releasing the physical hard copy birth certificate gets Obama out of the birther quandary.

People should just admit it. They don't want the chat logs because it will make them believe Wired more. They want the chat logs because the chat logs are fun drama. It doesn't make you a bad person to concede that; it just makes you a human being.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wired's Response to Glenn Greenwald (re:Lamo-Manning Chat... by grandalf on Wednesday December 29, 2010 @12:45AM (#2048055)
Hah. I really don't care about the personal drama in the logs. I mostly want to see where Assange stands at this point with respect to evidence (aside from potential testimony by Manning) that he violated the espionage act.
[ Parent | on HN ]