News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Art's sale value? Zero. The tax bill? $29M by asveikau on Friday July 19, 2019 @11:45AM (#20479568)
I don't think you see my point. IRS cannot be compelled to pay 80% price on every conceivable asset.

It's like telling any appraiser... Yeah you think it's worth that much? Prove it! Buy the sucker! If you did that multiple times they would go bankrupt, because sure they may be able to resell the thing if priced correctly but they need to pay for it in the first place. And to do it at the scale of IRS ... It's not a reasonable request or expectation.

Re:Art's sale value? Zero. The tax bill? $29M by MegaButts on Friday July 19, 2019 @12:29PM (#20480048)
But isn't it only a problem when there is a significant discrepancy between the market value and the IRS appraisal? Obviously the IRS doesn't have the funds to buy the entire market, but if people own something that's actually market value why would they sell it at a significant discount?

Also you're taking a gamble by challenging the IRS to buy something at a discount that they won't actually call your bluff and you lose out on money. And if you're actually standing by your personal assessment over theirs, you either make money or you get to skip the tax bill.

This seems like a much better balance than what we currently have.

Re:Art's sale value? Zero. The tax bill? $29M by ghostbrainalpha on Friday July 19, 2019 @12:32PM (#20480089)
As long as the IRS was given a sufficient window to pay for the item it would still work. There is no reason for them to have to pay up front.

If they can't sell the asset and then return 80% of it's market value to the original owner over the course of a year, than they were probably wrong about the market value.

Of course there are certain items that may take longer than a year to find the right buyer, mega yachts, specialized works of art, but if these things take years to sell and find the right buyer than their potential market value should be reduced to reflect that.