Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan
by StreamBright on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:24PM
(#20473117)
Not only that but they can happily MITM HTTPS as well. Not all the HTTPS sites use certificate pinning or HSTS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's a tough problem because certificate pinning kills a lot of legitimate use patterns; it's not something I'd like to see being the default everywhere.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan
by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:49AM
(#20476652)
Yes but this is how many companies protect their HTTPS traffic (including one financial institution I work for).
What root cert would they us for that?
The government of my country has at least one certificate that's trusted by Mozilla (and I guess Chrome and Windows too) by default.
It won't stay trusted if it is actively used for MITM attacks. At least that's the idea.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan
by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:55AM
(#20476684)
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan
by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:53AM
(#20476672)
You mean CA? There are many options depending on which agency and which target you are talking about. They have few options from stealing a CA from a legitimate CA user if the want anonymity or use one that is built in to your browsers or systems somebody else already pointed out in the thread.