News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by StreamBright on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:24PM (#20473117)
Not only that but they can happily MITM HTTPS as well. Not all the HTTPS sites use certificate pinning or HSTS.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by TeMPOraL on Thursday July 18, 2019 @03:42PM (#20473262)
It's a tough problem because certificate pinning kills a lot of legitimate use patterns; it's not something I'd like to see being the default everywhere.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:49AM (#20476652)
Yes but this is how many companies protect their HTTPS traffic (including one financial institution I work for).
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by cpach on Thursday July 18, 2019 @04:05PM (#20473450)
What root cert would they us for that?
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by yjqcy on Thursday July 18, 2019 @04:55PM (#20473845)
The government of my country has at least one certificate that's trusted by Mozilla (and I guess Chrome and Windows too) by default.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by xorcist on Thursday July 18, 2019 @05:14PM (#20473979)
It won't stay trusted if it is actively used for MITM attacks. At least that's the idea.
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:55AM (#20476684)
Re:MITM on HTTPS traffic in Kazakhstan by StreamBright on Friday July 19, 2019 @02:53AM (#20476672)
You mean CA? There are many options depending on which agency and which target you are talking about. They have few options from stealing a CA from a legitimate CA user if the want anonymity or use one that is built in to your browsers or systems somebody else already pointed out in the thread.