News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New information about Slack’s 2015 security incident by jhiesey on Thursday July 18, 2019 @10:25AM (#20470083)
Why throw away your computers? Why not remove/disconnect the batteries (if portable) and just store them somewhere in case you eventually no longer suspect a hardware hack, as in this case?
Re:New information about Slack’s 2015 security incident by maxtaco on Thursday July 18, 2019 @10:27AM (#20470108)
Re:New information about Slack’s 2015 security incident by malgorithms on Thursday July 18, 2019 @10:31AM (#20470174)
Further: Keybase is a security product and it wasn't deemed worth the risk for the CEO. And while Keybase isn't made of money, the $5k was roughly irrelevant compared to the other costs mentioned here and the _magnitude of the risk_.

If you haven't been through this kind of thing, it's hard to understand how scary it is to have a break-in of unknown origin. If you use strong, unique passwords as Max did, then you're almost certain it's a server break in (and again, this is why Slack is scary for sensitive info)...but being 99% certain isn't enough. Removing that computer permanently from the team gave peace of mind.

Re:New information about Slack’s 2015 security incident by voiper1 on Thursday July 18, 2019 @12:49PM (#20471638)
tl;dr: UEFI rootkits can survive operating system reinstallation and even a hard disk replacement.

That's why he needed a new physical computer.