Netflix drops 10% after missing on global paid subscribers

Re:Netflix drops 10% after missing on global paid subscribers by why-el on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @04:38PM (#20463731)

Your comment reminds of this wonderfully written post by Roger Ebert[1]. It's not the same topic, but there is something to be glanced at in his writing where he eludes to choice, editorial-ism, and doing a story regardless of what the audience wants.

[1] https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/video-games-can-ne...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Netflix drops 10% after missing on global paid subscribers by lostgame on Wednesday July 17, 2019 @06:01PM (#20464495)

This is the worst, most opinionated, garbage article I've ever read. I feel like I'm reading the article from the Simpsons, 'Old Man Yells at Cloud'.

In reference to 'Braid': 'She also admires a story told between the games levels, which exhibits prose on the level of a wordy fortune cookie.'

Anyone who needs to stoop to the level of insulting something to convince me it's not legitimate is not presenting their argument in an intelligent or unbiased manner. You wanted people to read this? I'm not even sure how it's relevant, but I can't get past how awfully written it is.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Netflix drops 10% after missing on global paid subscribers by why-el on Thursday July 18, 2019 @10:39AM (#20470276)

Sure, no worries. You probably don't know about Roger, who is a good writer actually and much humbler man than what you thought out of this post.

And I think you just misunderstood the statement, his fortune cookie reference is to the story in the game, not to the person referred to by "She'.

[ Parent | on HN ]