News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Python's super considered harmful by btilly on Tuesday December 28, 2010 @12:33PM (#2046055)
For #1 you can just use a closure.

For #2, the method documented in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/972/adding-a-method-to-an... doesn't seem so bad to me.

  object.methodname = new.instancemethod(function, object, class)
It may be deprecated. But it still works.
Re:Python's super considered harmful by cturner on Tuesday December 28, 2010 @01:22PM (#2046217)

    > For #1 you can just use a closure.
I don't think that will work. See the discussion about rebinding in the post or elsewhere in the thread.
Re:Python's super considered harmful by btilly on Tuesday December 28, 2010 @01:41PM (#2046286)
It is unclear to me what you think doesn't work. A closure can easily store state. As you yourself demonstrate in your rebinding example, you can store and mutate scope if you use a mutable datastructure (like a list) to avoid rebinding problems.

Perhaps if you gave an example of what you think doesn't work, I might understand your point.