Re:Boeing 737 Max ordered by Ryanair undergoes name change
by magduf on Monday July 15, 2019 @10:49AM
(#20441319)
Unfortunately, it's pretty hard to avoid the 737 for a lot of routes because it's so ubiquitous. Also, most of them were engineered and built before the current management, and have proven themselves with a good safety record so far, so they really should be OK. It's the new MAX model you really want to avoid, and it's probably a good idea to avoid the 787 as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing 737 Max ordered by Ryanair undergoes name change
by 52-6F-62 on Monday July 15, 2019 @11:37AM
(#20441832)
Why the 787? It's been my favourite ride so far—comfort-wise.
Re:Boeing 737 Max ordered by Ryanair undergoes name change
by magduf on Monday July 15, 2019 @12:16PM
(#20442243)
1. It was created during the current management era.
2. It was built in South Carolina at a new plant that had huge production issues, such as leaving metal shavings inside the airplanes where they would get into wiring harnesses.
Re:Boeing 737 Max ordered by Ryanair undergoes name change
by ulfw on Monday July 15, 2019 @12:31PM
(#20442406)
Let's not forget the exploding batteries which were fixed by putting a metal container around them and a hole in the hull, so when they inevitably explode again, they'll at least vent outside.
It'd be okay with that shit on a bus. Not on a plane in the middle over the Pacific. How the 787 got it's ETOPS rating is beyond me.
(actually it isn't. We have all witnessed how corrupt the FAA is by outsourcing it's own job to Boeing itself - the equivalent of a professor outsourcing paper grading to students themselves).
Re:Boeing 737 Max ordered by Ryanair undergoes name change
by jtnjns on Tuesday July 16, 2019 @12:54AM
(#20447575)
And this software bug that requires the plane to be turned off and on again every 248 days to prevent an integer overflow and loss of power.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/01/us-aviation...
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.g...