Re:Court rules against Oracle in Pentagon 'war cloud' litiga...
by metaphor on Saturday July 13, 2019 @07:40AM
(#20427578)
This article sure did a shitty, non-existent attempt at citing its references.
From the cow's mouth, here's the original JEDI Cloud solicitation[1]--which includes the latest amended SOO[2] and Oracle's pre-award protest[3]--and the actual court order[4].
Doesn't seem like anyone is really talking about it either, but it's worth noting that this isn't some gratuitous "here's $10B, we're locking ourselves in for the next decade, go buck wild" ordeal. This ID/IQ contract has a 2-year base with 3-, 3-, and 2-year options for the remaining years, and a maximum $10B cap iff the government exercises all options.
Here's to hoping the government doesn't royally screw themselves over by dropping the ball on CDRLs A007 and A014.
From the cow's mouth, here's the original JEDI Cloud solicitation[1]--which includes the latest amended SOO[2] and Oracle's pre-award protest[3]--and the actual court order[4].
Doesn't seem like anyone is really talking about it either, but it's worth noting that this isn't some gratuitous "here's $10B, we're locking ourselves in for the next decade, go buck wild" ordeal. This ID/IQ contract has a 2-year base with 3-, 3-, and 2-year options for the remaining years, and a maximum $10B cap iff the government exercises all options.
Here's to hoping the government doesn't royally screw themselves over by dropping the ball on CDRLs A007 and A014.
[1] https://www.fbo.gov/index.php?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=386...
[2] https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=845d0652768ef4a4749231d39a...
[3] https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=6cd8017d52d2b832855c41fb74...
[4] https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv...