News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brain activity can be used to measure how well you unders... by jgtrosh on Thursday July 11, 2019 @03:01AM (#20409647)
They're testing understanding for the learning set, but applying a correlation to estimate understanding on the test set.
Re:Brain activity can be used to measure how well you unders... by TrinaryWorksToo on Thursday July 11, 2019 @08:24AM (#20410953)
What is scientific causation but correlation that works to an acceptable quantity of Sigma?
Re:Brain activity can be used to measure how well you unders... by Nasrudith on Thursday July 11, 2019 @10:03AM (#20411560)
Causation also implies well sequential causality in some way and reproducibility. A subtle but crucial difference.

If most people on the battlefield are covered in their own blood will soon die that doesn't mean gathering a gallon of a person's own blood through several donations and then throwing it at them at a Gettysburg musuem will kill them.

Re:Brain activity can be used to measure how well you unders... by mannykannot on Thursday July 11, 2019 @10:05AM (#20411574)
As Feynman discussed in "The Character of Physical Law", there is more to it than that, but I think one can say that the empirical evidence underpinning all science can be characterized as correlation that passes various statistical tests.
Re:Brain activity can be used to measure how well you unders... by krisrm on Thursday July 11, 2019 @10:13AM (#20411627)
Causal studies need to control for confounding variables, for one. There are all sorts of spurious non causal correlations with low p values.