Re:Google Acquires Elastifile
by p_l on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @06:59PM
(#20397610)
There's already GCP Filestore.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Filestore is basically a single google-managed instance running NFS. It's much less sophisticated and resilient than EFS, but also can be much faster since it doesn't have the overhead of a distributed system. Don't try running something that touches lots of files like mercurial on EFS, trust me...
The article says Elastifile (which I know nothing about) will become part of filestore.
Re:Google Acquires Elastifile
by dogismycopilot on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @09:12PM
(#20398361)
Filestore is also really expensive for what is basically just NFS.
Managed services are generally for enterprise, where you're fully costing out support + security mitigation.
Eliminating team coordination tips the balance.
Re:Google Acquires Elastifile
by geerlingguy on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @09:53PM
(#20398549)
EFS is... surprisingly cheap, as long as you don’t need heavy sustained IO for more than a few hours at a time. Great for a simple file store and some big data purposes.