News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by ori_b on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @06:30PM (#20397376)
I present to you a person who thinks that because we can't tell for certain that it's going to rain next Wednesday, we're have no idea if next summer will be hotter than next winter.
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by zaroth on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @06:42PM (#20397468)
Not a very charitable interpretation of the comment.
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by SantalBlush on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @07:54PM (#20397966)
It was a false equivalence, and deserves to be treated as such.
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by ori_b on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @08:48PM (#20398241)
In which ways is it inaccurate?
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by zaroth on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @11:06PM (#20398863)
You can be accurate and still be uncharitable. Educate, don’t chastise or mock. And never make it personal.
Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by ori_b on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @11:10PM (#20398882)
Normally, charity in an interpretation means that there's a way that it could be taken where it makes sense. I don't think that's the case for this comment.

The most charitable interpretation I have is that the original poster is a paid shill -- in other words, they're bright enough to realize what they're saying is idiotic, but they're just doing a job to put food on the table. It'd take some evidence to sway me to that view.

Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by mirimir on Wednesday July 10, 2019 @01:20AM (#20399330)
Seriously?

I don't agree with their comment. But after looking at their comment history, I see no evidence for them being "a paid shill". Contrarian and outspoken, sure. But not a shill.

Re:U.S. has its wettest 12 months on record again by zaroth on Wednesday July 10, 2019 @11:11PM (#20408825)
So much for not making it personal!