There’s more than one way to write an IP address

Re:There’s more than one way to write an IP address by majke on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @10:03AM (#20391820)

Digging more about IPv6 representation:

- It's possible to stick "::" in many places

- It's possible to have :0000: before or after "::"

- leading zeros (:0001: is the same as :1:)

- "Text Representation of Special Addresses", so the ::192.168.0.1 representation

- hex uppercase vs hex lowercase

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s more than one way to write an IP address by kbirkeland on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @10:51AM (#20392324)

Also due to the ambiguity of ports also using a colon delimiter, the IPv6 address may be in brackets:

    [::1:2:0:0:dead:beef]:443

And link-local addresses are mandatory and scoped per interface, so they need a zone id supplied as either an integer or interface name:

    fe80::1:2:0:0:dead:beef%eth0

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s more than one way to write an IP address by Already__Taken on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @10:08AM (#20391873)

that rfc says upper/lower doesn't matter? Am I wrong?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s more than one way to write an IP address by deathanatos on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @11:12AM (#20392543)

That's the point: because it doesn't matter it provides two representations for the same semantic thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s more than one way to write an IP address by jolmg on Tuesday July 09, 2019 @12:03PM (#20393179)

Well, that's just like IPv4, then. They can still be canonicalized, if you need to compare them.

[ Parent | on HN ]