Ah yes, Arch certainly is much better. I've had enough to do with Arch when they totally borked my workflow three times in a row in a couple of months. One of the issues was rebuilding all of the Qt5 libraries without testing any of their dependents. All Qt5 applications simply stopped working.

I don't blame them though, one of the maintainers was supporting like, 3000 packages? I don't recall the exact number, but it was an impossible amount of work for a single individual. This strongly implies there was zero QA for these packages (an he really was doing it himself, it was not a front for an organization.)