News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by deelowe on Saturday July 06, 2019 @01:39PM (#20370756)
What makes you think 5g is just for phones? Also, what is a "phone" exactly these days? New ford vehicles ship with a wireless hotspot. A lot of laptops come with sim slots. Is a tablet a phone? What about a phone that has a usb-c port that can drive display port (or UltraGig) and supports bluetooth peripherals?

Once 5g is ubiquitous, hardwired internet connections will go the way of dedicated sound and video cars. Why would anyone want to deal with cable or dsl when everything already runs over IP anyways and they already have a phone plan?

Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by gruez on Saturday July 06, 2019 @02:10PM (#20370959)
>New ford vehicles ship with a wireless hotspot

to be used by... other phones

>A lot of laptops come with sim slots

really only useful if you're working on a train or something because most stationary places you'd use a laptop at has wifi.

>Is a tablet a phone? What about a phone that has a usb-c port that can drive display port (or UltraGig) and supports bluetooth peripherals?

Not sure where you're trying to get at here, but everything you've described is already covered by your prior point about laptops.

>Why would anyone want to deal with cable or dsl when everything already runs over IP anyways and they already have a phone plan?

data caps? I'd take a 1TB data cap on cable/dsl over an "unlimited" 5g plan with some arbitrary FUP.

Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by kylec on Saturday July 06, 2019 @04:09PM (#20371626)

    Why would anyone want to deal with cable or dsl when everything
    already runs over IP anyways and they already have a phone plan?
It’s not anything to “deal with”, it’s pretty much “set it and forget it”. But if 5G or whatever is more competitive in terms of price and performance, I’d have no problem switching. I welcome more ISP competition. But $80/month gets me 1TB of transfer at ~150Mbps on Comcast, and I doubt I’ll get a better deal over 5G.
Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by deelowe on Monday July 08, 2019 @01:37PM (#20384844)
Time will tell, but theoretically, 5G should cost less over time. It's a hell of a lot easier to install a bunch of microcells and provision them electronically than to schedule house calls and send out techs. That's assuming there are no issues with the tech.
Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by yyyk on Saturday July 06, 2019 @01:51PM (#20370848)
Because wired internet connections are faster and far more reliable - even taking into account 5G?
Re:U.S. is behind on 5G rules and deployment by sroussey on Saturday July 06, 2019 @01:48PM (#20370831)
Maybe they want internet inside the house (or car) where the fast 5G is blocked by walls, windows, etc.