Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Aussie ISP gets eye-watering IPv4 bill, shifts to IPv6. Parent comment
- v6<->v6 does not require NAT
- v6<->v4 requires NAT but does not require your v6 device also have a v4 address
Until the v6<->v4 is no longer needed you will always have some form of NAT as there aren't enough addresses to give everyone a v4.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
- v6<->v6 does not require NAT
- v6<->v4 requires NAT but does not require your v6 device also have a v4 address
Until the v6<->v4 is no longer needed you will always have some form of NAT as there aren't enough addresses to give everyone a v4.