Re:“Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked”: John Ioannid...
by donatzsky on Friday July 05, 2019 @04:11AM
(#20360745)
If said authorities were infallible, I'd agree with you. Unfortunately that is rarely the case.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked”: John Ioannid...
by AstralStorm on Friday July 05, 2019 @04:36AM
(#20360846)
Nature is full of poisons too. Sugar is one! (In the right big and/or chronic dose. Organisms have to deal with glycation damage all the time.)
Re:“Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked”: John Ioannid...
by TeMPOraL on Friday July 05, 2019 @04:29AM
(#20360806)
"Not infallible" doesn't mean "always wrong". Just because FDA made some mistakes, doesn't mean you can start doing the opposite of everything they say and live a happy and healthy life.
Authorities may be "in the pocket of Big Pharma", but by default, I'd still trust them much more than yours or mine non-expert opinion.
Re:“Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked”: John Ioannid...
by ben_w on Friday July 05, 2019 @07:35AM
(#20361706)
Authorities don’t have to be infallible to have a better track record than anyone else. If they did, we wouldn’t have senior software engineers, we would have the pointy head boss writing all the code; we wouldn’t have doctors, as everybody’s home remedy would be just as good; we wouldn’t have CEOs, as communism would be correct and the workers would be more effective at running their businesses than the owners ever were (hello ironic counterpoint); etc.
Of course, everybody including authorities is capable of making mistakes. It is generally a bigger mistake to think you know better than they do. Not always, but generally.