Re:Why UT Austin is second-rate at producing startup founders
by tfinster on Thursday December 23, 2010 @12:49PM
(#2035163)
I attended both UCSD (undergrad) and UTCS (PhD), and UT Austin is light years ahead in terms of fostering entrepreneurship at the academic level. Examples: UT had one of the very first business plan competitions in the world 30 years ago (MootCorp) and it created the very first tech commercialization competition 10 years ago (Idea2Product). My personal experience is that the university administration (president, VP of research, Austin Technology Incubator, deans) is very encouraging in regards to any and all entrepreneurship efforts - the major obstructions have come from tenure-track professors. Most research professors consider exploring startups a waste of time, since it does not directly lead to publications.
Another example is that as recently as five years ago, UT's business school (McCombs) discouraged their graduating MBAs from diving into startups. Reason: their rankings were heavily influenced by the salary their alumni rake in immediately after graduation. So the official party line was to encourage them to go into big business with a cushy salary. Luckily that's changing now.
Re:Why UT Austin is second-rate at producing startup founders
by puredemo on Thursday December 23, 2010 @02:09PM
(#2035497)
Just a side note, I see CS program ranking thrown around here quite often. Exactly where are these pulled from?
Big schools do not foster startups. I wonder if it's because smaller schools have more in common with startups? They have smaller staffs, leaner budgets, and typically fewer ridiculous processes. Key example: I just applied to Stanford and UTCS for my PhD. Stanford has clear info on deadlines and sent me an automated email reminder a few days before the app was due. UT Austin requires you to fill out two separate applications (one for the general UT system and another for UTCS), with different deadlines for each, inconsistent deadline info between the two systems, requiring duplicate information, and setting up a convoluted group of user accounts.
It is very hard to get big schools to understand startups. Virginia Tech was pushing very hard to encourage starting more tech companies, but their approach was to build a gigantic Corporate Research Center with isolated buildings and establishing formal "partnerships" with established or funded companies. Projects like the BT transit app get buzz only after they are a hit; and they don't try to compound the momentum by getting an order of magnitude more students working on their own apps, but rather let everything die down and force the few startup-friendly professors to start all over again.
As with most big organizations, the problems are fairly obvious. It's just nearly impossible to get them to change anything, especially since the main issue is a lack of willingness to change things.