Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by hjanssen on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:32AM
(#20342623)
Which has the side effect of requiring you to input a captcha every time you quickly want to google anything.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by zaarn on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:11AM
(#20342795)
I already have to do that, if you're on Firefox, you get treated like a bot and have to solve 10+ puzzles on recaptcha, possibly even just ending on a "network error" screen regardless.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by tty2300 on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:28AM
(#20342856)
If you enable the resist fingerprinting setting on Firefox every website will slam you with captchas and random errors.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by zaarn on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:50AM
(#20342945)
I don't run with resist fingerprinting, the problem persists even if I am on a fresh firefox install with no addons and try to log into my google account.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by ionised on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:45AM
(#20342919)
I enable all that stuff and the number of ReCaptchas, while annoying is probably on like 30% of the sites I visit. And most of them I can live without.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by squarefoot on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:44AM
(#20342681)
DuckDuckGo might be a cure to this problem. I set up it as default search engine on home main pc a few weeks ago and although I still have sometimes to resort to Google for a few searches, it got remarkably better compared to the past.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by Semaphor on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:04AM
(#20342768)
> Which has the side effect of requiring you to input a captcha every time you quickly want to google anything.
As I mainly use DDG and considering I get a fuck-you hardest-level (or simply "sending too many requests") recaptcha every time I want to use a site that uses it… What difference does it make? For the few cases where DDG's stupid "let's ignore search terms" decision bites me I can simply use startpage with !sp
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by dvfjsdhgfv on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:06AM
(#20342774)
No, AdNauseam doesn't work this way, and there are no problems with captcha whatsoever. Other anonymizing solutions might have this effect, but not AN.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by gattilorenz on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:26AM
(#20342846)
The op is implying that by using AN you might trigger some "bot warnings" and Google will start showing captcha more often. Considering that AN is quite similar to a bot, why wouldn't this be the case?
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by dvfjsdhgfv on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @08:27AM
(#20343653)
"Which has the side effect of requiring you to input a captcha every time you quickly want to google anything" - this is a common scenario not with AN but in scenarios when Google doesn't have much data about you - a fresh setup, no Google cookies, blocking cookies, Tor browser etc. AN is orthogonal to that - it simply "clicks" ads, bringing Google more money at the expense of advertisers. I use AN on several computers and observe no above-mentioned side effects when Google has enough data on you. When they don't, they will show the captcha. So it's orthogonal to AN.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by cloud_thrasher on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:40AM
(#20342663)
If ... opening 100 tabs doesn't crash your browser or freeze your computer first.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by darklajid on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:46AM
(#20342693)
Responding to this comment with glances in top left corner 250 tabs open in Firefox, consuming slightly below 1.3G of memory. WorksOnMyMachine
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by StreamBright on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:38AM
(#20342657)
I would rather pay for google and have no surveillance & ads.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by BorRagnarok on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:40AM
(#20342666)
Duckduckgo is free, has no surveillance and ads, and its just as good or better than google.
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by altschuler on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @04:45AM
(#20342686)
They do have ads[1], but they don't use (or have) tracking data for it.
1: https://help.duckduckgo.com/company/advertising-and-affiliat...
Re:Let us open 100 tabs of pure madness to fool trackers
by StreamBright on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @05:22AM
(#20342828)
Sorry I have to disagree. I use DuckDuckGo for year by now and 60% of the time I add !g to my queries. It is slowly improving over time but not quite yet there.