News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Analysis of Godlua Backdoor by mitchtbaum on Saturday July 06, 2019 @10:29AM (#20369854)
after a quick review of this brief (aqrtb?):

Lua-based binaries are being delivered via a Metasploit module for Atlassian Confluence Server CVE-2019-3396. other vulnerable servers can also be targeted with this payload, though it's mostly Linux servers now. active news sources include #godlua

https://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence

https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-3396/

https://twitter.com/hashtag/godlua?f=tweets&vertical=default

Re:An Analysis of Godlua Backdoor by sky_nox on Wednesday July 03, 2019 @08:47PM (#20350526)
It's interesting this malware uses DNS over HTTPS to avoid detection.
Re:An Analysis of Godlua Backdoor by ga-vu on Friday July 05, 2019 @03:39PM (#20365231)
Re:An Analysis of Godlua Backdoor by hannob on Friday July 05, 2019 @04:21PM (#20365539)
It doesn't. At least not in the "DNS over HTTPS - the protocol specified in an RFC" sense: https://twitter.com/bagder/status/1146740062127886338
Re:An Analysis of Godlua Backdoor by rolph on Friday July 05, 2019 @01:09PM (#20364074)
my eye homed in on these excerpts from the article:

--The file itself is a Lua-based Backdoor, we named it Godlua Backdoor as the Lua byte-code file loaded by this sample has a magic number of “God”

--Godlua Backdoor has a redundant communication mechanism for Command and Control [C2] connection, a combination of hardcoded dns name, Pastebin.com, GitHub.com as well as DNS TXT are used to store the C2 address, which is not something we see often. At the same time, it uses HTTPS to download Lua byte-code files, and uses DNS over HTTPS to get the C2 name to ensure secure communication between the bots, the Web Server and the C2.