News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antarctic sea ice – rapid decreases, reduced to lowest ar... by belorn on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @05:26AM (#20333485)
Looking at (https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/2207/economics/carbon-tax...) the primary argument against Carbon tax is that companies will somehow tax evade even more than in the past, and companies will move to more tax friendly companies than they already do.

Is there an argument against carbon tax that can't be said by any other tax?

Re:Antarctic sea ice – rapid decreases, reduced to lowest ar... by DennisP on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @11:08AM (#20335847)
The easy way to implement a carbon tax is to tax at major sources, like coal mines and oil wells, and let the producers pass on the cost to everyone else. It's not terribly difficult to assess the amount of coal produced by a mine.

It's also fairly difficult to move a coal mine to another country. Of course, people could import their carbon-intensive goods, but most proposals include tariffs on countries without comparable carbon fees. Tariffs like these are explicitly allowed by trade agreements.

Re:Antarctic sea ice – rapid decreases, reduced to lowest ar... by chewz on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @06:39AM (#20333812)
The objective of carbon tax is to give incentives to market participants and let the market to the job. In my opinion it will result in creating huge wealth transfers with much real benefit to the climate.

I would rather side with Naomi Klein that capitalism proved ineffective in solving problems of this scale.

Re:Antarctic sea ice – rapid decreases, reduced to lowest ar... by anonuser123456 on Tuesday July 02, 2019 @06:16PM (#20339889)
So decide by fiat it doesn't work rather than run the experiment?