News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House weighs encryption crackdown by daveFNbuck on Friday June 28, 2019 @12:55PM (#20306340)
How do you know it's not their sincerely held belief? Lots of people have concerns about the government listening in on their sermons and about dark forces changing holy messages to trick people into doing and believing the wrong things.
Re:White House weighs encryption crackdown by bitlax on Friday June 28, 2019 @01:18PM (#20306616)
How do I know that the newly invented religious tenet that the OP doesn't practice doesn't spring from a sincerely held belief?
Re:White House weighs encryption crackdown by sokoloff on Friday June 28, 2019 @01:51PM (#20306986)
What basis do you have that the religious tenet is newly invented? Even if it were, what's the basis to uphold that something newly invented is not a sincerely held belief?
Re:White House weighs encryption crackdown by bitlax on Friday June 28, 2019 @02:12PM (#20307220)
OP is clearly posing a hypothetical. And courts absolutely look to the amount of time and frequency with which one practices a tenet of their religion as evidence of sincerity. OP might be sincere, but a court would be unlikely to use that as evidence to justify, for example, a wrongful termination claim.
Re:White House weighs encryption crackdown by nkrisc on Friday June 28, 2019 @03:46PM (#20308153)
The Supreme Court just needs to decide it's not sincerely held.