News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Terence Tao's Raw Notes After His Princeton Comprehensive... by enriquto on Friday June 28, 2019 @08:28AM (#20303547)
Of course the professors were better read and had much more experience and knowledge. But you con infer from that report (even if the author tries to hide it) that the professors were extremely impressed by the young candidate.
Re:Terence Tao's Raw Notes After His Princeton Comprehensive... by aetimmes on Friday June 28, 2019 @10:35AM (#20304691)
Terrence's own recounting of the event [1] seems to contradict you:

"After many nerve-wracking minutes of closed-door deliberation, the examiners did decide to (barely) pass me; however, my advisor gently explained his disappointment at my performance, and how I needed to do better in the future."

[1] https://www.ams.org/about-us/LivingProof.pdf#%5B%7B%22num%22... (found elsewhere in the thread)

Re:Terence Tao's Raw Notes After His Princeton Comprehensive... by enriquto on Friday June 28, 2019 @10:44AM (#20304781)
The sentence before the one you quote is this:

"The rest of the exam then went fairly quickly as none of the examiners had prepared any truly challenging algebra questions."

Thus, he emptied the pool of questions prepared by the professors.

Notice that your quote does not really contradict a good impression upon the examiners. The nerve wracking is self reported, as is the word ``barely''. The later comments by the examiners may be also a generic sentence they say to everybody. Regardless of your level, you can always benefit for being told to do better.

Sure, if you ask these professors today they will probably say that they were very impressed by the young genius... but this does not really say much.