I don't know why this article is on the front page. There is nothing interesting or informative about it. It's just a smear campaign against a couple no-accounts.

The author is not even in communication with this kid any more, yet he feels the need to go publicize his version of a sour business deal with an unscrupulous cybersquatter. This article is petty and vengeful in a way that is IMHO every bit as shameful as the scumbaggery the Turkette kid engaged in.