Re:Brave Improves Its Ad-Blocker Performance with New Engine...
by lern_too_spel on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @08:14PM
(#20290618)
The content producers who distributed their videos on YouTube agreed to Google's monetization terms. They did not agree to Brave's. I cannot unilaterally make copies of Harry Potter books, sell them for a dollar, and give a cut (even a 50% cut to make the Brave analogy complete — they like to say they give a larger cut to publishers without mentioning that it is a larger cut of a much smaller pie) to JK Rowling. Even Brave eventually understood why this was wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Brave Improves Its Ad-Blocker Performance with New Engine...
by ForHackernews on Thursday June 27, 2019 @04:23AM
(#20292621)
But Google should be allowed to unilaterally copy snippets of data from all the websites on the internet into their search results?
People bending themselves backwards to hate Brave for doing things that are really not that different from what the big boys do.
Re:Brave Improves Its Ad-Blocker Performance with New Engine...
by lern_too_spel on Friday June 28, 2019 @12:26AM
(#20301466)
> But Google should be allowed to unilaterally copy snippets of data from all the websites on the internet into their search results?
No, and they don't. See meta nosnippet and robots.txt.
If the big boys did what Brave did, they would be sued to oblivion.