Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by xenospn on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @07:16PM
(#20290272)
Google also does not allow Windows Laptops/PCs anywhere near their campus.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by robocat on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @10:27PM
(#20291252)
Exactly: Google detected they were hacked by the Chinese government a decade ago ("Operation Aurora" affecting a lot of other companies including Adobe, Juniper, Rackspace, Yahoo, Symantec, Northrop Grumman, Morgan Stanley, Dow Chemical).
Google stopped allowing Windows to be used within the organisation in 2010 as a response.
I think any other organisation that continued to use Windows values features more than they value security (and I believe that is still the case: you can't secure Windows, Office or Microsoft browsers against state level actors).
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by amoshi on Thursday June 27, 2019 @08:45AM
(#20293879)
Source? Looked online and couldn't find anything apart from one or two untrustworthy mentions on quora.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by xenospn on Thursday June 27, 2019 @07:32PM
(#20299999)
I doubt anyone from Google is going to publicly comment on their internal security policies, but AFAIK this is a known fact for many years. I'm sure there's plenty of people who work for Google who can comment anonymously.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by nickpsecurity on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @04:12PM
(#20288642)
Security by obfuscation of techniques involved. Classic trick. It's the best so long as each security measure and their interactions are fairly secure.
Re:The West’s failed fight against China’s ‘Cloud Hopper’ ha...
by opportune on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @05:16PM
(#20289290)
I would say obfuscation is a valid strategy if also coupled with good security practices / algorithmic security. You're no less secure than if you were using the common flavors of good security practices (assuming you didn't create a mistake in rolling your own, which is a difficult assumption) but the effort required to target you is much higher than normal, and you are somewhat shielded from blanket-applying zero days.
Link to their somewhat vague white papers on the matter:
https://cloud.google.com/beyondcorp/