Re:Longest-running oil spill in history releasing more than ...
by SomeOldThrow on Monday June 24, 2019 @08:59PM
(#20270211)
I think your observation actually strengthens the parent comment’s point that people are more capable than they realize in researching and holding opinions on the world. Political pundits you see on cable, for instance, have largely the same credibility as the rest of us. What makes them pundits is that they’re paid for their opinion.
Edit: rereading the comments I think you may not have been trying to be contrary at all—my apologies for implying you were.
Re:Longest-running oil spill in history releasing more than ...
by saulrh on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:54PM
(#20270498)
I do think there's a difference between researching and holding an opinion and researching and holding an opinion that can be used to form accurate predictions about the future. I think that one of the things that's happening to us with social networks and such is that we're realizing that it is not always the case that more and freer information leads to better decisions. People have plenty of time and opportunity to do research now. They do not have the time and opportunity to learn to do good research.
Re:Longest-running oil spill in history releasing more than ...
by reubenmorais on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:57PM
(#20270515)
I think in this case the point is that people are capable of doing research and knowing the facts, keeping up with an ever changing topic. Who's the coach, what are the key players, what happened at the last game, who's being transferred where, strengths and weaknesses of teams and individual players, etc.
It may very well be that the conclusions people reach starting from the facts are emotionally charged, but I'd say it's better than how it happens with politics at the moment: people start from ignorance or falsehoods, and then make emotionally charged conclusions based on that.
I'd rather read youtube comments than listen to sports talk back.