Re:On Ocracoke Island, the only American dialect that is not...
by LyndsySimon on Monday June 24, 2019 @02:36PM
(#20266849)
Thanks for linking these - I'd seen them before, but hadn't caught the name of the book. I'll be picking it up :)
For what it's worth, my own experience says that the area for "Greater Appalachia" is pretty much 100% correct. The borders aren't quite sharp, and interesting things definitely happen where two or more "nations" meet.
I also know that West Virginia and middle Tennessee feel like "home" to me, and I'm from the Arkansas Ozarks.
Re:On Ocracoke Island, the only American dialect that is not...
by sudosteph on Monday June 24, 2019 @02:37PM
(#20266864)
I haven't read either of them, but from a glance I definitely agree with Woodard separating Appalachia into it's own region. Western NC has a very distinct culture and history. I don't think there's been any point in the last 100 years where natives of that region wouldn't view people from Raleigh as "outsiders".
Interestingly, Woodard's book echoes an earlier work, Joel Garreau's 1981 The Nine Nations of North America (https://www.amazon.com/Nine-Nations-North-America/dp/0380578...). Garreau, however, put all of NC inside his "Dixie" nation, the analogue to Woodard's "Deep South." I wonder how much of this can be chalked up to differences in methodology, and how much to demographic shifts in the three decades separating Woodard's work from Garreau's.