News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by emilstahl on Monday June 24, 2019 @08:03AM (#20262618)
“AS396531 "Allegheny Technologies Incorporated" is leaking a better-reachable route for AS13335 "Cloudflare, Inc." towards AS701 "Verizon Business/UUnet" explaining the current LSE going on.”

https://twitter.com/OhNoItsFusl/status/1143117619106652160

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by mbell on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:05AM (#20263136)
> AS396531 - Allegheny Technologies Incorporated

That appears to be a steel/alloys company. Why are they operating BGP equipment?

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by bin0 on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:16AM (#20263233)
Any company which operates large factories probably has its own ASN and runs its own networks. Every thing's gotta be internet-enabled these days, and at a certain scale, it becomes cost-effective.
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by Hikikomori on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:17AM (#20263241)
Why not? Pretty much everyone that needs a redundant internet connection (dual ISP) does it.
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by mbell on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:51AM (#20263496)
> Why not?

It seems silly to me that an end user company not providing any network services which only has a 256 IP block has the ability to break a significant portion of the internet with a configuration mistake. There are several ways to setup dual ISPs and routing that don't involve such risk.

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by wbl on Monday June 24, 2019 @11:25AM (#20264436)
You need BGP and provider independent space for your two ISPs to both announce your space. What's the alternative approach?
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by mbell on Monday June 24, 2019 @11:57AM (#20264857)
Don't rely on a single IP routing through multiple ISPs, use DNS.
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by kazen44 on Monday June 24, 2019 @04:56PM (#20268387)
what? this statement makes no sense from a networking perspective.

thisissue still exists if you break up your IP space, it just makes it far harder to manage.

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by jaziek on Monday June 24, 2019 @09:52AM (#20263505)
Most places that are just doing it for that reason won't be advertising anything other than their own /24 or whatever though. You have to fuck up pretty spectacularly (and have your upstream providers do the same) to be able to accomplish what has happened here.
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by steveklabnik on Monday June 24, 2019 @11:06AM (#20264245)
Pittsburgh is a town that (used to be) run by steel. Even a few decades after that dominance, this particular company is still a $4B one on the S&P 400. I'm pretty sure this is the company that my grandfather worked at for decades; his brother did from high school to retirement (except during World War II). They apparently significantly polluted the air in the high school district next to mine ten years ago.

It doesn't surprise me at all that they are still a part of infrastructure, somehow.

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by jgrahamc on Monday June 24, 2019 @08:07AM (#20262643)
They aren't the original leaker.

Update: sorry, I may have been wrong. Hard to see clearly in the fog of BGP.

Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by q3k on Monday June 24, 2019 @08:26AM (#20262791)
Can you elaborate?
Re:Route Leak Impacting Cloudflare by jcalabro on Monday June 24, 2019 @08:35AM (#20262863)
Seconded. I've received notices from multiple carriers that ASN 396531 is the root cause of the leak.