In fact I am in the middle of fixing up code that I wrote as novel research because the powers that be want it in a production system. The code review I got was detailed and - frankly - embarassing at times because all the uncertainties and meanderings of research had me change pieces of code over and over and over again to a point where remnants of old approaches didn't stand out to me anymore and where I had at times built on top of bad decisions because they were meant as a temporary hack and experiment, but worked well enough and stayed in. And by the time I submitted the code for review I had become blind to these mistakes. I know how to write good and clean code and I get through code reviews easily when I know what I am doing. Not this time, though.
My take on the parent comment is that it has some adversity and feeling of superiority to it. And I don't like that. I agree that in the end it is not a competition, I didn't think that I would have to point it out.
Why are you framing this as though it's adversarial and the parent comment is stating some kind of superiority, and you're here to turn it around and put them in their place?
Isn't teamwork all about doing better than one person working alone?