News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPv6 Will Worsen the Spam and Malware Problems by mike-cardwell on Monday December 20, 2010 @11:05AM (#2024685)
I have been an email administrator for an ISP and a University, and I have been active in many spam related forums/mailing lists for many years now, and I completely disagree.

Blacklists catch far more spam than bayes, are far easier to administer and far less resource intensive. Personally, I try to deploy both, with blacklists first in line, then bayes to catch some stuff that the blacklists miss.

"Sender authentication" is a vague term. If you mean verification of the sender address via various DNS lookups, then yes, that's quite useful, but still nowhere near as useful as blacklists.

This is how I see people setting up their spam filters in the industry. It might not be idealistic, but it is effective and wide spread.

Re:IPv6 Will Worsen the Spam and Malware Problems by tomjen3 on Monday December 20, 2010 @01:17PM (#2025182)
There are better methods than just doing a dns check. Actually signing the messages works too, as does whitelisting of ips by the domain owner.
Re:IPv6 Will Worsen the Spam and Malware Problems by mike-cardwell on Monday December 20, 2010 @02:54PM (#2025522)
You're describing SPF and DKIM. Both of which can be used by people sending legitimate mail, and people sending spam...

SPF and DKIM are good for preventing some false positives. They're not good for stopping spam.

I would bet that currently, well over 90% of spam that is rejected, is rejected because of blacklist lookups.