News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo. Parent comment

Re:RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo by a_bonobo on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @12:43PM (#20224873)
It would be funny if note forgers would use the same software for improved authenticity, re-type the text, and do it correctly - the forged notes could be easily spotted since they use the correct text.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo by asperous on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @12:47PM (#20224908)
Reminds me of: https://www.gislounge.com/map-traps-intentional-mapping-erro...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo by davidkuhta on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @05:52PM (#20227747)
Mountweazels and Paper Towns!

"Fictitious Entry" is a fun read:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo by whitecream on Thursday June 20, 2019 @02:13AM (#20230369)
"Easily" is a bit of an exaggeration - the text is so tiny you wouldn't be able to read it without putting it up to your face and you'd run into the other security features first.
[ Parent | on HN ]