News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing Timescale Cloud by SteveBash on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @02:06AM (#20221171)
Q: Regarding multi-cloud. Say if AWS has an outage will Timescale cloud fallback to use GCP or Azure?

Can something like this be provided? Not sure if the network latency between different cloud providers would allow doing a multi-master replication scheme.

Re:Announcing Timescale Cloud by dianasaur323 on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @08:26AM (#20222634)
You select the public cloud vendor you want your machine spun up on. So no, if AWS has a full outage, it won't fall back to a different cloud. Failover is done at an availability zone level.

Since TimescaleDB is also open-source, if you want that kind of replication scheme, you can always install on VMs across clouds. However, as you rightly pointed out, network latency is a definite concern and impacts the feasibility of RPO and RTO.

Re:Announcing Timescale Cloud by mfreed on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @10:58AM (#20223943)
One thing to add:

The Timescale Cloud does allow you to do is create asynchronous read replicas across different clouds and regions (with a couple clicks).

You can then "fork" a read replica (at any point in time) and make it a primary to start serving out of that cloud (again, with just a couple clicks).

That's not quite the same as auto-replication/failover between clouds, but getting pretty far there.

Re:Announcing Timescale Cloud by ddorian43 on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @05:46AM (#20222025)
Can be done with an async-replication db like ScyllaDB. Or even CP db (just harder/slower).
Re:Announcing Timescale Cloud by dianasaur323 on Wednesday June 19, 2019 @08:27AM (#20222644)
Yeah! CockroachDB is also a really cool multi-cloud DB. That being said, they are really more for transactional workloads, and less purpose built for time-series.

I guess there are always trade-offs in the software world.