Re:How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two Days ...
by qazpot on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @07:11AM
(#20211695)
The book and the movie are very different but share the same philosophical underpinnings.
> pushed her hard against a wall when she apparently wanted to leave. Such an action and attitude wouldn't be acceptable these days.
I am tired of reading such comments where the current moral standards are being used to judge works of fiction written 50 years ago.
Re:How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two Days ...
by afthonos on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @10:24AM
(#20213340)
Of all the possible defenses of that scene (Deckard is a villain; Deckard literally does not consider her a person at this point in the story; Deckard is trying to break her association with being the rich niece of the inventor of replicants; others), this is the absolute worst.
So has anyone read the book and can say I misremeber, that the film and the book were at all similar? Honestly curious.
I watched the original again recently and it stood up rather well. The one thing that really dated it wasn't the curved CRTs which I can overlook but when Deckard had Rachael in his flat, and pushed her hard against a wall when she apparently wanted to leave. Such an action and attitude wouldn't be acceptable these days.